Relocation as Escape — or Just Another Way of Staying Stuck?

Not long ago, I had a conversation with someone who had been deeply stuck for years.

He had tried many paths — new jobs, new relationships, workshops, therapy, medication, and other attempts to create change. He was aware of his situation and genuinely wanted things to move. Yet nothing seemed to create lasting movement. Some of what kept him stuck came from circumstances far beyond his control: where he was born, how he was raised, and cultural structures that limited his sense of belonging. At the same time, he was also carrying internal patterns that made it difficult to move forward even when opportunities appeared.

Then came the familiar turn: he decided that relocation would finally be the answer.

He presented the plan with clarity and conviction. He had researched destinations, considered practical steps, and could explain why this move would create the conditions he needed. I found myself hopeful for him.

A week later, the conversation reversed. The obstacles now seemed overwhelming. The same practical concerns he had minimized before were suddenly decisive. Nothing external had changed — only the story he was telling himself about what was possible.

After we spoke, I found myself returning to an old question: Is relocation actually helpful for someone in this kind of stuckness? Or can it sometimes become another sophisticated way of circling the same core difficulty?

I know something about this territory from my own life. When I first moved to Italy, I arrived with significant loans and very little financial buffer. I worked at market stalls to get by. Around that time, I heard about a woman who had done similar work. She spent three months preparing intensively for her move through that job. She flew to Italy — and after one night there, the loneliness hit her so hard that she returned home immediately.

In my own first half-year in Italy, there were three separate moments when I came close to buying a ticket and ending the experiment. These moments were not driven by homesickness. They came from sudden financial and bureaucratic shocks that arrived without warning, in the middle of the deep uncertainty that comes with building a life in a new country.

This is part of why relocation is often more complicated than people expect.

It is not only about visas, housing, or language. It also has to do with the way our minds construct the places we imagine moving to. Take Australia, for example. Most of us already have some image of what Australia “is” — vast landscapes, unusual animals, a certain quality of light. This image is not neutral. It is a simplified version we have assembled from scattered information, stories, and assumptions. We rarely notice how much we have rounded off the edges and filled in the gaps to create a coherent picture. Even if we watched every documentary ever made about Australia, we would still not truly know the place. We would only know an edited version shaped by other people’s choices of what to show and what to leave out.

Our minds work in a similar way. They act as editing machines — selecting, organizing, and constructing our perceptions of people, places, and possibilities according to existing patterns. This is why relocation can feel both seductive and disappointing. We are often moving toward an edited version of a place, and away from an edited version of ourselves.

Many people also carry the quiet assumption that changing location will somehow change who they are. They are often surprised to discover that they have brought the same mind with them — the same patterns in relationships, the same ways of relating to pressure or uncertainty, the same internal difficulties. The geography has changed, but the person living there has not automatically been transformed.

And then there is what gets left behind: relationships, familiarity, and often family — aging parents, children growing up far from grandparents, siblings, and wider circles of connection. These losses are real, even when the move is wanted and chosen.

This is the territory I now work with in expat and relocation coaching.

My role is not to help people plan the logistics of a move. What I can offer is a space to look more honestly at the hopes, fears, and assumptions that surround the decision itself. To clarify what someone is actually hoping the move will give them, and to build the inner capacity to stay connected to their values even when the new place turns out to be both more and less than they imagined — and when what they thought they were leaving behind travels with them anyway.

Returning to the man I spoke with at the beginning, and to the question that stayed with me after our conversation: if someone is deeply stuck, is relocation the right move?

When I first moved to Italy, I was myself in a fragile place — working a job I didn’t enjoy, after a difficult breakup, with little emotional or financial stability. In that state, there can be something both romantic and practical about making a deliberate, well-considered move. At the time, I often felt frustrated and wished the person I was speaking with would simply “do it” and discover his own capacity. But with more reflection, I’ve come to see it differently.

If careful exploration shows that a move could genuinely improve someone’s life or their family’s life, then the next step is not blind action, but an operational plan — paired with deliberate work on building the psychological flexibility needed to enter a new cultural and social world. That flexibility is what allows people to meet the real difficulties of relocation without being derailed by them.

If you are considering relocation, or you have already moved and are discovering that some of the old difficulties came along, you are not failing. You are encountering something that is true for many people who make this choice.

I offer a free introductory conversation if you would like to explore what this kind of support might look like for you.

Next
Next

The Body Leads: Mindfulness as the Meeting Point of ACT and Yogic Wisdom